
Monteverdi Vespers
Nov 18, 2012 - 7:00 PM
Monteverdi's Ingenious Synthesis in the Vespers of 1610
by Thomas MayMusic history is filled with examples of monumental achievements that fell into oblivion soon after their composers’ deaths (if not before), only to acquire a vivid “afterlife” somewhere down the road thanks to the dedicated efforts of performers and scholars. Of course the paradigmatic example would be J.S. Bach’s St. Matthew Passion – an obscurity for several generations after Bach’s death until Felix Mendelssohn (and others) became its fervent advocates.
Yet such neglect was relatively short-lived in comparison with the lengthy historical deep freeze endured by Claudio Monteverdi’s first masterpiece of sacred music. Published in Venice in 1610, the Vespers of the Blessed Virgin (or, to use the work’s Italian title, Vespro della Beata Vergine) is part of an extraordinarily ambitious collection of sacred music (see sidebar) that also included a Mass setting. But the Vespers of 1610 (another title by which this music is known) remained at best a footnote for centuries until scholarly interest was rekindled early in the 19th century – around the time that Bach’s music also began to enjoy the same phenomenon – and it had to wait another century to be revived in performance, in a special concert given in Zurich in 1935.
Certainly the Vespers has made a comeback since then; but rather than diminish the uncertainties surrounding what Monteverdi created, such recognition has actually brought them into sharper focus. Even to refer to the Vespers as a unified “work” rests on an unverifiable assumption. For there is no unequivocal proof that Monteverdi intended the score that nowadays is usually presented in the context of a self-contained concert performance to be a single work, whether unified in artistic or in liturgical terms. (Such a secular setting for the entire Vespers moreover involves a kind of presentation more suited to the oratorios of Handel’s era and would have been unknown to Monteverdi, although his title page indicates that individual pieces might be performed in a secular palace setting.) Some argue that the 1610 publication should indeed be interpreted not as a single unified Vespers celebration but as a diverse, flexible collection of numbers available to be excerpted or performed in various contexts. This very diversity was in any case surely meant to display the full range of Monteverdi’s compositional prowess.
In this regard, the closer analogy is with Bach’s Mass in B minor as opposed to the St. Matthew Passion, since the latter was undoubtedly written for liturgical performance whereas the purpose of the Mass – a miscellaneous compilation or a unified spiritual and artistic testament? – remains a matter of debate. The list of almost uncanny parallels between the Vespers and the Mass in B minor doesn’t end there. Monteverdi’s publication and parts of Bach’s Mass might have been produced as elaborate “job applications” motivated by unhappiness with their respective current employers. We have no record of a complete performance of either work – assuming they were even meant to be performed as such – during the lifetime of each of their composers. Most significantly, the scope of both the Vespers and the Mass is breathtakingly encyclopedic and magisterial. Like Bach, Monteverdi shows his command of the wealth of musical knowledge that had accumulated by his time by effortlessly weaving together “ancient” styles and the most contemporary developments.
Of course sacred music occupied the center of Bach’s job responsibilities for the majority of his career. The mystery around the Vespers deepens when we realize that Monteverdi had little if any involvement with sacred music – at best there are scant hints – during the two decades leading up to the 1610 publication, when he served on the staff of Vincenzo Gonzaga (1562-1612), Duke of Mantua, eventually becoming music director at Gonzaga’s wellappointed palace. (The composer’s duties even included a stint tagging along with the duke to Hungary on a military campaign against the Turks and presiding over musical performances in the camp.)
Monteverdi had emerged as a precocious composer of motets and madrigals he published while still a teenager, and more recently he had expressed his wish to be able to compose sacred music for the Mantuan court. Yet as far as is known, throughout his prime Monteverdi had focused on secular genres. The years leading up to the Vespers witnessed his devotion to the revolutionary new style he cultivated in his books of madrigals and in his early operas. Indeed, among the most intriguing aspects of the Vespers is the interplay between secular and sacred idioms that underlies the collection.
Why would Monteverdi turn his attention to sacred music at this time, when he had already established a formidable reputation as a secular composer? Perhaps he did gather pieces that had been composed over many years, or he may have crafted the entire collection in a brief, concentrated timespan – this is just one of the Vespers’ many enigmas. What scarce evidence we do have, from a handful of letters, indicates how overburdened and underappreciated the composer felt regarding his position in Mantua. Simply “resigning” and seeking out another court appointment was not an option in this era. (Even Bach would later face jail time for resisting his employer’s will.) The field of church music, by contrast, beckoned as an alternative, and likely less-stressful possibility.
But there was a further impediment beyond Monteverdi’s lack of a track record in sacred composition: the fact that he was identified with the farout “modernists” for his embrace of the new style had led to controversy eagerly stirred up by enemies. Giovanni Maria Artusi, an archconservative cleric, published a pamphlet critiquing Monteverdi’s disregard of the longstanding rules of counterpoint (a style also known as the prima pratica). The composer, aided by commentary from his brother, defended himself by proudly characterizing his aesthetic as a seconda pratica – a more recent practice in which unprepared dissonances and surprising tonal shifts were not only allowed but considered necessary to enhance the emotional truth of the text being set.
The ingenious integration of both styles that is another hallmark of the Vespers thus acquires additional significance if we accept the theory that the publication of this imposing collection in 1610 was intended to advertise what Monteverdi could offer as a master of sacred music, whether to hoped-for employers in Rome or in Venice. John Whenham, an authority on the composer, argues that the Vespers of 1610 might be interpreted as a defense far more effective than any verbal counterargument against detractors by proving Monteverdi’s skill at actually following the prima pratica while at the same time seducing with the irresistible, intricate beauty of his seconda pratica expressivity.
Even more, the feat of braiding these strands together into complex structures would draw attention to his sheer technical brilliance. Monteverdi accomplishes this synthesis most obviously in the musical architecture of all five Psalm movements, the sonata, the hymn, and the Magnificat: in all of these he uses the preexisting ancient plainchant melody associated with the text in question (otherwise known as the cantus firmus) as a structural girder around which material in the new style is unfolded and elaborated. Like the Renaissance/Baroque marvel of the expanded St. Peter’s, Monteverdi builds over longstanding foundations with awe-inspiring imagination and majesty.
Tellingly, the publication of 1610 includes a setting of the Mass (Missa in illo tempore) strictly based on an “old-school” motet by Gombert. This might have hedged his bets all the more, so that there were elements to attract the relatively conservative taste in control in Rome as well as the somewhat bolder leanings of Venetian patrons. Monteverdi made a point of dedicating “the fruits of my nocturnal labor” as gathered in this impressive publication to Pope Paul V. Such a dedication, writes Whenham, “once accepted, implied papal acceptance of the music within the volume” and “a powerful antidote” to the composers’ critics. As things turned out, Monteverdi did not receive a job offer from Rome, but three years later came his appointment as maestro di cappella at St. Mark’s in Venice, where he contentedly remained for the rest of his long career.
Alongside these unresolved questions of the origin, motivation, and context behind the publication of the Vespers, there remains a host of uncertainties about how to perform the music that was in fact printed. Monteverdi clearly envisioned a sound world on the most sumptuous scale of his time, to be realized by an ensemble of virtuoso musicians: seven solo singers, instrumentalists who have taxing solo parts, and a first-rate choir capable of navigating the constantly changing stylistic currents of the musical flow. (Interestingly, he also included an alternative setting of the Magnificat – for 6- rather than 7-part choir and with only continuo accompaniment – suggesting the possibility of a reduced-scale version of the entire Vespers that could be performed with limited forces in more modest circumstances.)
Yet details are lacking on the most basic level about orchestration and the disposition of solo voices vis-à-vis the choir in the larger choral movements. Ambiguities abound as to how to deploy Monteverdi’s late Renaissance/ early Baroque instrumental ensemble, which comprises three groups, each of which has prominence throughout the score: strings, winds (including the trumpet-like, wooden cornetto and the sackbut, a forerunner of the trombone), and continuo (with its signature blend of organ, theorbo, lute, violone, and cello). There are no dynamic or even tempo indications. Every interpretation of the Vespers thus takes on a unique, unpredictable flavor. For tonight’s performance, Music Director Grant Gershon has opted after careful study to use the edition prepared by Robert King, since he believes it represents ‘the best combination of the most recent scholarship while also being user friendly for live performers.”
In this sense, encountering the Vespers in performance involves still another level of synthesis beyond what Monteverdi achieved in his masterful combination of the sacred with the secular, of ancient with modern styles, of solo with choral singing, and of the human voice with a rich orchestral tapestry: This is the synthesis between an aesthetic perspective contemporaneous with Shakespeare’s final decade and our own expectations of musical meaning.
SIDEBAR:
Structure of the Vespers
In Monteverdi’s time, Vespers – part of the cycle of Roman Catholic prayers to be recited or sung at set times of each day (early evening in this case) – was structured around a sequence of five Psalms, a hymn, the Magnificat, and other prayers. A set of responsory antiphons was used to frame the Psalms and Magnificat, with specific relevance for the liturgical time of year or feast day at hand. Monteverdi constructed his Vespers to be suitable for any of the major feasts in honor of the Virgin Mary. (There are also arguments that the Vespers may have been intended for other sacred feast days, including that of Saint Barbara, patron of the composer’s employer at the time, the Duke of Mantua.)
The most traditional aspect of the texts Monteverdi includes in his Vespers thus pertains to the large choral movements (starting with the briefer choral versicle introductory movement, which incorporates the instrumental toccata from his recent opera L’Orfeo of 1607). These consist of the five Psalm settings – Dixit Dominus (6-part choir), Laudate pueri (8-part choir), Laetatus sum (6-part choir), Nisi Dominus (10-part choir), and Lauda Ierusalem (7-part choir) – the hymn Ave Maris Stella (8-part choir), and the Magnificat (7-part choir). Traditional plainchants associated with these texts are embedded within Monteverdi’s complex and varied textures. (For example, the tenors in the divided chorus of Nisi Dominus repeat the plainchant back and forth at a slow speed while musical events unfold around it.)
Remarkably unconventional is Monteverdi’s inclusion of five special pieces he calls “sacred concertos” – a sequence of motets for steadily increasing numbers of solo voices with continuo accompaniment, as well as the mostly instrumental Sonata sopra Santa Maria. These entail highly expressive solo numbers and other alternatives that are either substitutes for or supplements to the antiphons (though the latter would still have to be recited as mandated by the liturgy). The tenor solo Nigra sum and soprano duet Pulchra es, set texts from the Song of Songs that on the surface are erotically charged but had become allegorically associated with love of Mary. Yet Monteverdi’s most up-to-date new style, perfected in his madrigals and opera writing, underscores the tension of more secular associations. The tenor trio Duo Seraphim is a tour de force of colorful solo vocal technique and “text painting” – and at the same time profoundly spiritual in its effect. Another use of echo effects resounds in the motet Audi coelum for two tenors and choir. The instrumentalists come to the fore in the wonderful Sonata (which has nothing to do with later sonata form), while a soprano choir enters and repeats its cantus firmus in varied rhythmic form 11 times.
Title | Composers/Arranger | Guest Artists |
---|---|---|
Vespro della Beata Vergine | Claudio Monteverdi | Suzanne Anderson, SopranoClaire Fedoruk, SopranoJanelle DeStefano, Mezzo SopranoDaniel Chaney, TenorMichael Lichtenauer, TenorMatthew Tresler, TenorScott Graff, Bass-BaritoneReid Bruton, BassMusica Angelica Baroque Orchestra, Guest Ensemble |
1. Domine ad adiuvandum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
2. Dixit Dominus | Claudio Monteverdi | |
3. Nigra sum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
4. Laudate pueri | Claudio Monteverdi | |
5. Pulchra es | Claudio Monteverdi | |
6. Laetatus sum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
7. Duo Seraphim | Claudio Monteverdi | |
8. Nisi Dominus | Claudio Monteverdi | |
9. Audi coelum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
10. Lauda lerusalem | Claudio Monteverdi | |
11. Sonata sopra 'Sancta Maria ora pro nobis' | Claudio Monteverdi | |
12. Ave maris stella | Claudio Monteverdi | |
13. Magnificat | Claudio Monteverdi |
Archival Recording
Date | Review | Media | Reviewer |
---|---|---|---|
Nov 20, 2012 |
Monteverdi's sensual, suggestive late Renaissance work is rarely heard. The chorale performs it for the first time and stays true to the complex piece. By Mark Swed, Los Angeles Times Music Critic November 19, 2012, 8:15 p.m. Monteverdi's &q... Read More Monteverdi's sensual, suggestive late Renaissance work is rarely heard. The chorale performs it for the first time and stays true to the complex piece. By Mark Swed, Los Angeles Times Music Critic November 19, 2012, 8:15 p.m. Monteverdi's "Vespers for the Blessed Virgin," which was treated to a rare and exhilarating performance by the Los Angeles Master Chorale on Sunday night at Walt Disney Concert Hall, is a towering masterpiece of the late Renaissance. It had its first performance in 1610 in Santa Barbara. No, not that Santa Barbara but the Palatine basilica of Santa Barbara in Mantua, Italy. |
Los Angeles Times | Mark Swed |
Nov 19, 2012 |
A very large, almost sold out Walt Disney Concert Hall audience heaped enthusiastic applause and approval on Maestro Grant Gershon and his fellow artists at the conclusion of Claudio Monteverdi’s sprawling Vespers, described in Thomas May’s excellent program annotations as &l...
Read More
A very large, almost sold out Walt Disney Concert Hall audience heaped enthusiastic applause and approval on Maestro Grant Gershon and his fellow artists at the conclusion of Claudio Monteverdi’s sprawling Vespers, described in Thomas May’s excellent program annotations as “a diverse, flexible collection of numbers available to be excerpted or performed in various contexts. This diversity was in any case surely meant to display the full range of Monteverdi’s compositional prowess.”
Monteverdi lived at a most interesting time for any composer: at the end of the long Renaissance period in which unmetered music was the rule, mostly in the sacred context, which was challenged by the metered secular madrigals that the composer wrote in his earliest years, a collision of styles that drew criticism down upon his head. Publication of the Vespers, also known as Vespro della Beata Vergine, was his answer to the critics. Although published in 1610, elements of the Vespers were probably written over a ten-year span prior to that year. There are 13 movements, most of which may be performed independently of the others, but which are largely comprised of Psalm settings interspersed by highly florid solos, duets and smaller ensembles that allow for individual vocal fireworks, some of which are credited to Monteverdi’s own creativity and not carried over into the newly emerging, dryer early Baroque style, and some of which were. It is said that ladies of Ferrara and Mantua vied with each other to produce the most astounding vocal displays. Such displays were generously performed by several soloists drawn from the ranks of the Master Chorale itself. They were sopranos Suzanne Anderson and Claire Fedoruk; mezzo soprano Janelle DeStefano; tenors Daniel Chaney, Michael Lichtenauer and Matthew Tresler; baritone Scott Graff, and bass Reid Bruton. All were excellent advocates of Monteverdian style points, with Ms. Fedoruk and Mr. Chaney meeting the greatest challenges. Mr. Tresler’s “Nigra sum” was perhaps the most memorable for artistic shading matched to the text. The duet-cum-trio “Duo Seraphim” (Two Angels) begun by Messrs. Cheney and Lichtenauer (previously incorrectly identified as Mr. Graff), later with the addition of Mr. Tresler when the text changes to “Tres sunt” (There are three), made magic. A personal favorite was the Marian antiphon “Ave maris stella” (Hail, Star of the Sea) brilliantly worked out by Maestro Gershon, starting with an a cappella first stanza, adding to that a solo theorbo accompaniment on the second stanza, joined in the third by the continuo, the next three stanzas sung by Ms. DeStefano, Ms. Fedoruk and Mr. Graff, with all forces combining at the conclusion. Throughout, the Master Chorale sang with expected brilliance, although for this occasion, a “small call” of 40 voices was employed. In the early 17th century, so far as we know, this music was never performed in a venue the size of Disney Hall, so one can forgive Ms. Fedoruk’s having to choose between projecting to the topmost balcony and singing the delicate filigree to which her voice is so well suited. Her artistry was never in question although not every lower note could be heard. Maybe it was Maestro Gershon’s intimate association with Los Angeles Opera, where he presides as chorus director, that predisposed a constant movement on stage, but Chorale members were given a virtual road map of stage placements, which humorously led to Mr. Chaney’s forgetting which side he was to be on, and his tip-toeing across to the other side, to the audience’s great amusement. He was not alone in losing focus on placement, by the way. No matter. The singing was always superb. Los Angeles’s own world class Musica Angelica Baroque Orchestra accompanied, with an equally small-sized component of 13 players, of whom Ingrid Matthews and Janet Strauss impressed greatly with their embellished violin interludes in various movements, but particularly in the Sonata sopra: Sancta Maria, ora pro nobis. Maestro Gershon kept a perfect balance between instruments and voices throughout, which is not an easy task in a series of movements constantly shifting participants. The long, sustained applause at concert’s end endorsed Maestro Gershon’s choice of the Vespers, and the utterly musical product that resulted. Read Less |
LA Opus | Douglas Neslund |
Nov 18, 2012 |
On Sunday, Nov. 18th, 2012, at The Walt Disney Hall, the LA Master Chorale under the baton of Grant Gershon along with the Musica Angelica Baroque Orchestra gave a superb performance of religious music, Vespers 1610, written over 500 years ago by Claudio Monteverdi. <... Read More On Sunday, Nov. 18th, 2012, at The Walt Disney Hall, the LA Master Chorale under the baton of Grant Gershon along with the Musica Angelica Baroque Orchestra gave a superb performance of religious music, Vespers 1610, written over 500 years ago by Claudio Monteverdi. |
Examiner.com | Ahdda Shur |
Nov 28, 2012 |
Los Angeles today might not be the first place that comes to mind when seeking out hymns to the Blessed Virgin Mary. However, a recent concert on Sunday, November 18, at the Walt Disney Concert Hall, featuring Monteverdi’s Vespers (Ve... Read More Los Angeles today might not be the first place that comes to mind when seeking out hymns to the Blessed Virgin Mary. However, a recent concert on Sunday, November 18, at the Walt Disney Concert Hall, featuring Monteverdi’s Vespers (Vespro della Beata Vergine) of 1610, was not the first time that this city has lived up to its literal name. |
Crisis Magazine | Robert R. Reilly |
Nov 30, 2012 |
After Los Angeles Master Chorale's (LAMC) astoundingly successful performance of Claudio Monteverdi's Vespers of the Blessed Virgin (commonly known as the Vespers of 1610, having been published in that year), I felt the same rejuvenation and relaxation that would follow a lu... Read More After Los Angeles Master Chorale's (LAMC) astoundingly successful performance of Claudio Monteverdi's Vespers of the Blessed Virgin (commonly known as the Vespers of 1610, having been published in that year), I felt the same rejuvenation and relaxation that would follow a luxuriant all-day health spa retreat. Having never heard the revolutionary and monumental work before, I was astonished that something written in the last decade of Shakespeare's life could be so sensual. The texts may be sacred, but much of the composition clearly makes use of secular music — most notably dance; hence, my relaxation from the appropriate solemnity, and my rejuvenation from the modes of music, including Gregorian chant (aka plainsong or plainchant), Renaissance dance, madrigal, and opera (notably, the first opera still to be regularly performed is Monteverdi's L'Orfeo, composed for the court of Mantua in 1607). |
Stage and Cimena | Tony Frankel |
Dec 12, 2012 |
Downtown L.A. is certainly an epicenter for 21st century hustle and bustle. But inside of the Walt Disney Concert Hall, with its futuristic façade, one can find an acoustical oasis from the dissonant sounds of traffic, construction, boom boxes and the like, far from the madding c... Read More Downtown L.A. is certainly an epicenter for 21st century hustle and bustle. But inside of the Walt Disney Concert Hall, with its futuristic façade, one can find an acoustical oasis from the dissonant sounds of traffic, construction, boom boxes and the like, far from the madding crowd. To paraphrase Max Ehrmann's splendiferous poem, Desiderata, within this vestibule of a more genteel culture one can "Flow placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in sacred music." |
Hollywood Progressive | Ed Rampell |
Monteverdi's Ingenious Synthesis in the Vespers of 1610
by Thomas May Music history is filled with examples of monumental achievements that fell into oblivion soon after their composers’ deaths (if not before), only to acquire a vivid “afterlife” somewhere down the road thanks to the dedicated efforts of performers and scholars. Of course the paradigmatic example would be J.S. Bach’s St. Matthew Passion – an obscurity for several generations after Bach’s death until Felix Mendelssohn (and others) became its fervent advocates. Yet such neglect was relatively short-lived in comparison with the lengthy historical deep freeze endured by Claudio Monteverdi’s first masterpiece of sacred music. Published in Venice in 1610, the Vespers of the Blessed Virgin (or, to use the work’s Italian title, Vespro della Beata Vergine) is part of an extraordinarily ambitious collection of sacred music (see sidebar) that also included a Mass setting. But the Vespers of 1610 (another title by which this music is known) remained at best a footnote for centuries until scholarly interest was rekindled early in the 19th century – around the time that Bach’s music also began to enjoy the same phenomenon – and it had to wait another century to be revived in performance, in a special concert given in Zurich in 1935. Certainly the Vespers has made a comeback since then; but rather than diminish the uncertainties surrounding what Monteverdi created, such recognition has actually brought them into sharper focus. Even to refer to the Vespers as a unified “work” rests on an unverifiable assumption. For there is no unequivocal proof that Monteverdi intended the score that nowadays is usually presented in the context of a self-contained concert performance to be a single work, whether unified in artistic or in liturgical terms. (Such a secular setting for the entire Vespers moreover involves a kind of presentation more suited to the oratorios of Handel’s era and would have been unknown to Monteverdi, although his title page indicates that individual pieces might be performed in a secular palace setting.) Some argue that the 1610 publication should indeed be interpreted not as a single unified Vespers celebration but as a diverse, flexible collection of numbers available to be excerpted or performed in various contexts. This very diversity was in any case surely meant to display the full range of Monteverdi’s compositional prowess. In this regard, the closer analogy is with Bach’s Mass in B minor as opposed to the St. Matthew Passion, since the latter was undoubtedly written for liturgical performance whereas the purpose of the Mass – a miscellaneous compilation or a unified spiritual and artistic testament? – remains a matter of debate. The list of almost uncanny parallels between the Vespers and the Mass in B minor doesn’t end there. Monteverdi’s publication and parts of Bach’s Mass might have been produced as elaborate “job applications” motivated by unhappiness with their respective current employers. We have no record of a complete performance of either work – assuming they were even meant to be performed as such – during the lifetime of each of their composers. Most significantly, the scope of both the Vespers and the Mass is breathtakingly encyclopedic and magisterial. Like Bach, Monteverdi shows his command of the wealth of musical knowledge that had accumulated by his time by effortlessly weaving together “ancient” styles and the most contemporary developments. Of course sacred music occupied the center of Bach’s job responsibilities for the majority of his career. The mystery around the Vespers deepens when we realize that Monteverdi had little if any involvement with sacred music – at best there are scant hints – during the two decades leading up to the 1610 publication, when he served on the staff of Vincenzo Gonzaga (1562-1612), Duke of Mantua, eventually becoming music director at Gonzaga’s wellappointed palace. (The composer’s duties even included a stint tagging along with the duke to Hungary on a military campaign against the Turks and presiding over musical performances in the camp.) Monteverdi had emerged as a precocious composer of motets and madrigals he published while still a teenager, and more recently he had expressed his wish to be able to compose sacred music for the Mantuan court. Yet as far as is known, throughout his prime Monteverdi had focused on secular genres. The years leading up to the Vespers witnessed his devotion to the revolutionary new style he cultivated in his books of madrigals and in his early operas. Indeed, among the most intriguing aspects of the Vespers is the interplay between secular and sacred idioms that underlies the collection. Why would Monteverdi turn his attention to sacred music at this time, when he had already established a formidable reputation as a secular composer? Perhaps he did gather pieces that had been composed over many years, or he may have crafted the entire collection in a brief, concentrated timespan – this is just one of the Vespers’ many enigmas. What scarce evidence we do have, from a handful of letters, indicates how overburdened and underappreciated the composer felt regarding his position in Mantua. Simply “resigning” and seeking out another court appointment was not an option in this era. (Even Bach would later face jail time for resisting his employer’s will.) The field of church music, by contrast, beckoned as an alternative, and likely less-stressful possibility. But there was a further impediment beyond Monteverdi’s lack of a track record in sacred composition: the fact that he was identified with the farout “modernists” for his embrace of the new style had led to controversy eagerly stirred up by enemies. Giovanni Maria Artusi, an archconservative cleric, published a pamphlet critiquing Monteverdi’s disregard of the longstanding rules of counterpoint (a style also known as the prima pratica). The composer, aided by commentary from his brother, defended himself by proudly characterizing his aesthetic as a seconda pratica – a more recent practice in which unprepared dissonances and surprising tonal shifts were not only allowed but considered necessary to enhance the emotional truth of the text being set. The ingenious integration of both styles that is another hallmark of the Vespers thus acquires additional significance if we accept the theory that the publication of this imposing collection in 1610 was intended to advertise what Monteverdi could offer as a master of sacred music, whether to hoped-for employers in Rome or in Venice. John Whenham, an authority on the composer, argues that the Vespers of 1610 might be interpreted as a defense far more effective than any verbal counterargument against detractors by proving Monteverdi’s skill at actually following the prima pratica while at the same time seducing with the irresistible, intricate beauty of his seconda pratica expressivity. Even more, the feat of braiding these strands together into complex structures would draw attention to his sheer technical brilliance. Monteverdi accomplishes this synthesis most obviously in the musical architecture of all five Psalm movements, the sonata, the hymn, and the Magnificat: in all of these he uses the preexisting ancient plainchant melody associated with the text in question (otherwise known as the cantus firmus) as a structural girder around which material in the new style is unfolded and elaborated. Like the Renaissance/Baroque marvel of the expanded St. Peter’s, Monteverdi builds over longstanding foundations with awe-inspiring imagination and majesty. Tellingly, the publication of 1610 includes a setting of the Mass (Missa in illo tempore) strictly based on an “old-school” motet by Gombert. This might have hedged his bets all the more, so that there were elements to attract the relatively conservative taste in control in Rome as well as the somewhat bolder leanings of Venetian patrons. Monteverdi made a point of dedicating “the fruits of my nocturnal labor” as gathered in this impressive publication to Pope Paul V. Such a dedication, writes Whenham, “once accepted, implied papal acceptance of the music within the volume” and “a powerful antidote” to the composers’ critics. As things turned out, Monteverdi did not receive a job offer from Rome, but three years later came his appointment as maestro di cappella at St. Mark’s in Venice, where he contentedly remained for the rest of his long career. Alongside these unresolved questions of the origin, motivation, and context behind the publication of the Vespers, there remains a host of uncertainties about how to perform the music that was in fact printed. Monteverdi clearly envisioned a sound world on the most sumptuous scale of his time, to be realized by an ensemble of virtuoso musicians: seven solo singers, instrumentalists who have taxing solo parts, and a first-rate choir capable of navigating the constantly changing stylistic currents of the musical flow. (Interestingly, he also included an alternative setting of the Magnificat – for 6- rather than 7-part choir and with only continuo accompaniment – suggesting the possibility of a reduced-scale version of the entire Vespers that could be performed with limited forces in more modest circumstances.) Yet details are lacking on the most basic level about orchestration and the disposition of solo voices vis-à-vis the choir in the larger choral movements. Ambiguities abound as to how to deploy Monteverdi’s late Renaissance/ early Baroque instrumental ensemble, which comprises three groups, each of which has prominence throughout the score: strings, winds (including the trumpet-like, wooden cornetto and the sackbut, a forerunner of the trombone), and continuo (with its signature blend of organ, theorbo, lute, violone, and cello). There are no dynamic or even tempo indications. Every interpretation of the Vespers thus takes on a unique, unpredictable flavor. For tonight’s performance, Music Director Grant Gershon has opted after careful study to use the edition prepared by Robert King, since he believes it represents ‘the best combination of the most recent scholarship while also being user friendly for live performers.” In this sense, encountering the Vespers in performance involves still another level of synthesis beyond what Monteverdi achieved in his masterful combination of the sacred with the secular, of ancient with modern styles, of solo with choral singing, and of the human voice with a rich orchestral tapestry: This is the synthesis between an aesthetic perspective contemporaneous with Shakespeare’s final decade and our own expectations of musical meaning. SIDEBAR: Structure of the Vespers In Monteverdi’s time, Vespers – part of the cycle of Roman Catholic prayers to be recited or sung at set times of each day (early evening in this case) – was structured around a sequence of five Psalms, a hymn, the Magnificat, and other prayers. A set of responsory antiphons was used to frame the Psalms and Magnificat, with specific relevance for the liturgical time of year or feast day at hand. Monteverdi constructed his Vespers to be suitable for any of the major feasts in honor of the Virgin Mary. (There are also arguments that the Vespers may have been intended for other sacred feast days, including that of Saint Barbara, patron of the composer’s employer at the time, the Duke of Mantua.) The most traditional aspect of the texts Monteverdi includes in his Vespers thus pertains to the large choral movements (starting with the briefer choral versicle introductory movement, which incorporates the instrumental toccata from his recent opera L’Orfeo of 1607). These consist of the five Psalm settings – Dixit Dominus (6-part choir), Laudate pueri (8-part choir), Laetatus sum (6-part choir), Nisi Dominus (10-part choir), and Lauda Ierusalem (7-part choir) – the hymn Ave Maris Stella (8-part choir), and the Magnificat (7-part choir). Traditional plainchants associated with these texts are embedded within Monteverdi’s complex and varied textures. (For example, the tenors in the divided chorus of Nisi Dominus repeat the plainchant back and forth at a slow speed while musical events unfold around it.) Remarkably unconventional is Monteverdi’s inclusion of five special pieces he calls “sacred concertos” – a sequence of motets for steadily increasing numbers of solo voices with continuo accompaniment, as well as the mostly instrumental Sonata sopra Santa Maria. These entail highly expressive solo numbers and other alternatives that are either substitutes for or supplements to the antiphons (though the latter would still have to be recited as mandated by the liturgy). The tenor solo Nigra sum and soprano duet Pulchra es, set texts from the Song of Songs that on the surface are erotically charged but had become allegorically associated with love of Mary. Yet Monteverdi’s most up-to-date new style, perfected in his madrigals and opera writing, underscores the tension of more secular associations. The tenor trio Duo Seraphim is a tour de force of colorful solo vocal technique and “text painting” – and at the same time profoundly spiritual in its effect. Another use of echo effects resounds in the motet Audi coelum for two tenors and choir. The instrumentalists come to the fore in the wonderful Sonata (which has nothing to do with later sonata form), while a soprano choir enters and repeats its cantus firmus in varied rhythmic form 11 times.Title | Composers/Arranger | Guest Artists |
---|---|---|
Vespro della Beata Vergine | Claudio Monteverdi | Suzanne Anderson, SopranoClaire Fedoruk, SopranoJanelle DeStefano, Mezzo SopranoDaniel Chaney, TenorMichael Lichtenauer, TenorMatthew Tresler, TenorScott Graff, Bass-BaritoneReid Bruton, BassMusica Angelica Baroque Orchestra, Guest Ensemble |
1. Domine ad adiuvandum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
2. Dixit Dominus | Claudio Monteverdi | |
3. Nigra sum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
4. Laudate pueri | Claudio Monteverdi | |
5. Pulchra es | Claudio Monteverdi | |
6. Laetatus sum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
7. Duo Seraphim | Claudio Monteverdi | |
8. Nisi Dominus | Claudio Monteverdi | |
9. Audi coelum | Claudio Monteverdi | |
10. Lauda lerusalem | Claudio Monteverdi | |
11. Sonata sopra 'Sancta Maria ora pro nobis' | Claudio Monteverdi | |
12. Ave maris stella | Claudio Monteverdi | |
13. Magnificat | Claudio Monteverdi |
Archival Recording
Date | Review | Media | Reviewer |
---|---|---|---|
Nov 20, 2012 |
Monteverdi's sensual, suggestive late Renaissance work is rarely heard. The chorale performs it for the first time and stays true to the complex piece. By Mark Swed, Los Angeles Times Music Critic November 19, 2012, 8:15 p.m. Monteverdi's &q... Read More Monteverdi's sensual, suggestive late Renaissance work is rarely heard. The chorale performs it for the first time and stays true to the complex piece. By Mark Swed, Los Angeles Times Music Critic November 19, 2012, 8:15 p.m. Monteverdi's "Vespers for the Blessed Virgin," which was treated to a rare and exhilarating performance by the Los Angeles Master Chorale on Sunday night at Walt Disney Concert Hall, is a towering masterpiece of the late Renaissance. It had its first performance in 1610 in Santa Barbara. No, not that Santa Barbara but the Palatine basilica of Santa Barbara in Mantua, Italy. |
Los Angeles Times | Mark Swed |
Nov 19, 2012 |
A very large, almost sold out Walt Disney Concert Hall audience heaped enthusiastic applause and approval on Maestro Grant Gershon and his fellow artists at the conclusion of Claudio Monteverdi’s sprawling Vespers, described in Thomas May’s excellent program annotations as &l...
Read More
A very large, almost sold out Walt Disney Concert Hall audience heaped enthusiastic applause and approval on Maestro Grant Gershon and his fellow artists at the conclusion of Claudio Monteverdi’s sprawling Vespers, described in Thomas May’s excellent program annotations as “a diverse, flexible collection of numbers available to be excerpted or performed in various contexts. This diversity was in any case surely meant to display the full range of Monteverdi’s compositional prowess.”
Monteverdi lived at a most interesting time for any composer: at the end of the long Renaissance period in which unmetered music was the rule, mostly in the sacred context, which was challenged by the metered secular madrigals that the composer wrote in his earliest years, a collision of styles that drew criticism down upon his head. Publication of the Vespers, also known as Vespro della Beata Vergine, was his answer to the critics. Although published in 1610, elements of the Vespers were probably written over a ten-year span prior to that year. There are 13 movements, most of which may be performed independently of the others, but which are largely comprised of Psalm settings interspersed by highly florid solos, duets and smaller ensembles that allow for individual vocal fireworks, some of which are credited to Monteverdi’s own creativity and not carried over into the newly emerging, dryer early Baroque style, and some of which were. It is said that ladies of Ferrara and Mantua vied with each other to produce the most astounding vocal displays. Such displays were generously performed by several soloists drawn from the ranks of the Master Chorale itself. They were sopranos Suzanne Anderson and Claire Fedoruk; mezzo soprano Janelle DeStefano; tenors Daniel Chaney, Michael Lichtenauer and Matthew Tresler; baritone Scott Graff, and bass Reid Bruton. All were excellent advocates of Monteverdian style points, with Ms. Fedoruk and Mr. Chaney meeting the greatest challenges. Mr. Tresler’s “Nigra sum” was perhaps the most memorable for artistic shading matched to the text. The duet-cum-trio “Duo Seraphim” (Two Angels) begun by Messrs. Cheney and Lichtenauer (previously incorrectly identified as Mr. Graff), later with the addition of Mr. Tresler when the text changes to “Tres sunt” (There are three), made magic. A personal favorite was the Marian antiphon “Ave maris stella” (Hail, Star of the Sea) brilliantly worked out by Maestro Gershon, starting with an a cappella first stanza, adding to that a solo theorbo accompaniment on the second stanza, joined in the third by the continuo, the next three stanzas sung by Ms. DeStefano, Ms. Fedoruk and Mr. Graff, with all forces combining at the conclusion. Throughout, the Master Chorale sang with expected brilliance, although for this occasion, a “small call” of 40 voices was employed. In the early 17th century, so far as we know, this music was never performed in a venue the size of Disney Hall, so one can forgive Ms. Fedoruk’s having to choose between projecting to the topmost balcony and singing the delicate filigree to which her voice is so well suited. Her artistry was never in question although not every lower note could be heard. Maybe it was Maestro Gershon’s intimate association with Los Angeles Opera, where he presides as chorus director, that predisposed a constant movement on stage, but Chorale members were given a virtual road map of stage placements, which humorously led to Mr. Chaney’s forgetting which side he was to be on, and his tip-toeing across to the other side, to the audience’s great amusement. He was not alone in losing focus on placement, by the way. No matter. The singing was always superb. Los Angeles’s own world class Musica Angelica Baroque Orchestra accompanied, with an equally small-sized component of 13 players, of whom Ingrid Matthews and Janet Strauss impressed greatly with their embellished violin interludes in various movements, but particularly in the Sonata sopra: Sancta Maria, ora pro nobis. Maestro Gershon kept a perfect balance between instruments and voices throughout, which is not an easy task in a series of movements constantly shifting participants. The long, sustained applause at concert’s end endorsed Maestro Gershon’s choice of the Vespers, and the utterly musical product that resulted. Read Less |
LA Opus | Douglas Neslund |
Nov 18, 2012 |
On Sunday, Nov. 18th, 2012, at The Walt Disney Hall, the LA Master Chorale under the baton of Grant Gershon along with the Musica Angelica Baroque Orchestra gave a superb performance of religious music, Vespers 1610, written over 500 years ago by Claudio Monteverdi. <... Read More On Sunday, Nov. 18th, 2012, at The Walt Disney Hall, the LA Master Chorale under the baton of Grant Gershon along with the Musica Angelica Baroque Orchestra gave a superb performance of religious music, Vespers 1610, written over 500 years ago by Claudio Monteverdi. |
Examiner.com | Ahdda Shur |
Nov 28, 2012 |
Los Angeles today might not be the first place that comes to mind when seeking out hymns to the Blessed Virgin Mary. However, a recent concert on Sunday, November 18, at the Walt Disney Concert Hall, featuring Monteverdi’s Vespers (Ve... Read More Los Angeles today might not be the first place that comes to mind when seeking out hymns to the Blessed Virgin Mary. However, a recent concert on Sunday, November 18, at the Walt Disney Concert Hall, featuring Monteverdi’s Vespers (Vespro della Beata Vergine) of 1610, was not the first time that this city has lived up to its literal name. |
Crisis Magazine | Robert R. Reilly |
Nov 30, 2012 |
After Los Angeles Master Chorale's (LAMC) astoundingly successful performance of Claudio Monteverdi's Vespers of the Blessed Virgin (commonly known as the Vespers of 1610, having been published in that year), I felt the same rejuvenation and relaxation that would follow a lu... Read More After Los Angeles Master Chorale's (LAMC) astoundingly successful performance of Claudio Monteverdi's Vespers of the Blessed Virgin (commonly known as the Vespers of 1610, having been published in that year), I felt the same rejuvenation and relaxation that would follow a luxuriant all-day health spa retreat. Having never heard the revolutionary and monumental work before, I was astonished that something written in the last decade of Shakespeare's life could be so sensual. The texts may be sacred, but much of the composition clearly makes use of secular music — most notably dance; hence, my relaxation from the appropriate solemnity, and my rejuvenation from the modes of music, including Gregorian chant (aka plainsong or plainchant), Renaissance dance, madrigal, and opera (notably, the first opera still to be regularly performed is Monteverdi's L'Orfeo, composed for the court of Mantua in 1607). |
Stage and Cimena | Tony Frankel |
Dec 12, 2012 |
Downtown L.A. is certainly an epicenter for 21st century hustle and bustle. But inside of the Walt Disney Concert Hall, with its futuristic façade, one can find an acoustical oasis from the dissonant sounds of traffic, construction, boom boxes and the like, far from the madding c... Read More Downtown L.A. is certainly an epicenter for 21st century hustle and bustle. But inside of the Walt Disney Concert Hall, with its futuristic façade, one can find an acoustical oasis from the dissonant sounds of traffic, construction, boom boxes and the like, far from the madding crowd. To paraphrase Max Ehrmann's splendiferous poem, Desiderata, within this vestibule of a more genteel culture one can "Flow placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in sacred music." |
Hollywood Progressive | Ed Rampell |